20
Jun
This is the Buckley Family. The children’s names were Susan &John. As a Halloween joke, the kids in the neighborhood were going to get a dummy & pretend to chop its head off. The Buckley children thought it would be hilarious to actually kill their mum, so when the kids walked up the door they got an axe and slaughtered her. Once everyone figured out what they had done, they called the police, but the kids were long gone by then. The only picture of them was this photo, taken by a trick or treater. The mothers body was found half eaten.
Comments
Leave a Reply
Niki on 06.20.2010
O.O Like, wow.
Berrie on 06.20.2010
Uhhh. Nope.
http://www.changingportraits.com/mmud.htm
Josh on 06.20.2010
That’s why it’s in the “Myths” category ;)
Berrie on 06.20.2010
lul. I didn’t mean to come off as a killjoy; I like this blog. :D
jesus on 01.24.2011
guyz cmon thats not nice lol
Unknown on 01.29.2011
Loool!!! The photo looks like it was edited… Look at the head and the boy’s hand it’s so unreal. And do you think that they can picture themselves, no right? So there should be another person who can help them to take that picture and that person should be freaking out knowing that those kids murdered their mother right??? Pshhhhh!! Totaly fake lol!
Neste on 02.21.2012
О_о ужас
Crystin Segura on 05.07.2012
bitch titts, that is all.
Evelyn on 05.19.2012
Bad photoshop. Blurred head, no blood on the ax, that neck looks totally unreal. Also, their “mother” looks like a man.
Pretty stupid story. It was probably written by a 13-year-old.
Seriously people, at least try to photoshop the picture well.
Buckley descendant on 06.24.2012
Those could be my ancestors
Sasha on 09.28.2012
If this was true the body would be limp… which it clearly isn’t. Now the question is why does the girl have an axe in her hand? That doesn’t look photoshopped to me.
FuxUp on 09.29.2012
It’s under “myths” as someone pointed out silly sillies. It’s just for fun. Appreciate the dark urban legends that are made up :]
Emiliy on 09.29.2012
omb that axe looks like it was drawed
chloe on 09.29.2012
This artist created the picture http://www.changingportraits.com/mmud.htm
Jess on 10.08.2012
Sasha said that it can’t be real on the basis that the body’s not limp. Incorrect. Now, I don’t know how real or fake this is, but the Victorians were really into post mortem photographs. They made their dead look real for a photograph before burying them; a lasting memory of them if you like. So… Even though we don’t know how real this is, even if it were, the limp body wouldn’t necessarily be a problem.
cynthia on 03.01.2013
If you read on Pinterest. They had a trick or treater take the pic for them.
Kaylee on 05.06.2013
The damned description even says “Taken by a trick or treater” I mean do some of you people even read the description on things?
It’s literally like you guys just looked at the picture and went to the comments with “OH SO FAKE [insert reason here]”
Not to say it’s not fake, as it all well could be, but please, try NOT to be the bane of any intellect or common sense.
Stephanie on 05.09.2013
It’s fake…check out this website. This was created by an artist who is into changing pictures…much like the ones on the Haunted Mansion ride at Disney World. http://www.changingportraits.com/mmud.htm
Wolfgang on 05.13.2013
Cameras were owned by professional photographers during that time period, they were big and bulky and not very portable. I highly doubt trick or treaters would be carrying around a piece of equipment that probably cost more than their parents earned in 2 or 3 years.
Also the wound is too clean and neat. In order to have a wound that clean it would have had to be made in one cut. Making it with a hatchet would be impossible for an adult much less a child. There would also be a large amount of blood everywhere!
Jerrold on 06.15.2013
Who would have brought a camera with them back then?